Thursday, June 5, 2014

Buying a car in the 21st century, what a headache!

Hello, everyone! I hope you are having a great week so far and enjoying the good weather, which there hasn’t been much of lately. Myself, I’ve been having a rather bizarre week. Last Tuesday, my husband, Harry, and I decided we were in need of a new car, we have had our old one for ages now and it has been giving us problems lately, so why not a new car? After researching for hours, we came across two very interesting pieces of advertisement, so I thought: why not share it with you, my fellow readers?

The following advert comes from TIME magazine and is an advert for the new Mazda Child in the Front/Child in the Back series. The second advert also comes from TIME magazine and it is for the new family car Note from Nissan. 




To start with, I will be talking about the target audiences for these adverts. The ads aim at families wanting to buy a car, of course.  Basically, their message is to say that both cars were designed to be normal cars and not fast, dangerous cars where a big family wouldn’t feel safe or comfortable.  I mean, I wouldn’t buy a car where I can’t fit my whole family but I also would like to have a stylish car, everyone likes to have nice things, right? 

One interesting thing my husband pointed out is that there is no real reference to the performance of the car, so how will the buyer know whether this “family car” thing will actually work or not? Seriously, they should at least point out the fuel use or something to provide information about how much will the car consume and the considerations to be taken when buying these cars. We like eco cars: those who do not consume very much and our budget for cars are limited.

The Nissan Note shows two kids complaining about mixing their school bags; something that happens in every single household with the two sexes; at home it never stops! The company wants to emphasize the fact that their car has a divider in the car trunk in order for your kids to stop fighting and be a happy family. In other words, the new Nissan Note will bring happiness to the family and will prevent the children from fighting.

For the new Mazda series, the ad shows a kid and presumably his young father hugging each other and smiling together wearing a t-shirt with the design of the car. The slogan for the car is “Child in the Front/Child in the Back” and that could be interpreted as if the father was a child, which gives humor to this advert. The image on their t-shirts show the front and back of the car and the back is placed on the kids t-shirt and the front on the dads t-shirt. They are both smiling and once again, the ad suggests that having this car will give the family happiness and pleasure. It also shows a sense of unity since they are hugging and the father is holding his kids hand, as well as a sense of security since the kid is going to be seated at the back, rather than at the front where they are not supposed to be sitting.

Both ads make the reader believe that if they buy the car they are going to be secure, protected, pleased, and comfortable and the car will bring peace of mind, happiness and delight to all members of the family. After all, isn’t that what we all want? Keep everyone happy? For us, both ads had a strong message and tried very hard on conveying their message.               

It was very difficult to convince my husband into buying a new car; his experiences with new cars aren’t the best! Four years ago when Claire, our youngest daughter, was born we decided to buy a new car since we were going to be too many for our tiny Volkswagen. We opted for the safe, family friendly Honda van; our expectations were extremely high. On the first few days of the arrival of the car, everything was going splendid; it was like riding on a car from heaven. It was right on the perfect dates; the kids were out on holidays and so Harry, the kids and myself embarked on an adventure with the new car. We didn’t want to go very far, since Claire was only 4 months old, so we decided to go south to Arizona to visit the Grand Canyon. First few miles on the road were amazing but two hours later the car decided to stop working. We were stranded on the highway for at least five hours!! The van wouldn’t re start. That was the first of many bad nerve-wrecking experiences with the van, so for us it is very important to have a dependable, predictable, decent car!

Neither of the adverts use big fonts or accentuate wording too much, and that’s a fair reflection of our society nowadays. We’ve all became lazy readers and barely anyone ever reads, so to catch the attention of the reader companies focus on images and pretty colors rather than having a lot of words which will make their audience easily bored making them throw away the ad and look at something else.

Anyways, after hours and hours of research we finally found the perfect, reliable car for our family! I believe the Nissan Note is the appropriate car for us, it focuses on both sexes, give us space for everything and Nissan sounds like a stable brand for a family our size.  

That’s all, folks! I will be updating my blog next Monday; I have a quite complicated schedule this week, the kids are having a party and I have got to organize the whole thing. Wish me luck!  Missing you already!

P.S.: Please, comment below on which advert do you think is the most effective and what car would you buy!


http://ibmsmartercommerce.sourceforge.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Roses_Bunch_Of_Flowers.jpeg
http://ibmsmartercommerce.sourceforge.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Roses_Bunch_Of_Flowers.jpeg
http://ibmsmartercommerce.sourceforge.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Roses_Bunch_Of_Flowers.jpeg

Monday, May 12, 2014

Buying a car in the 21st century, what a headache!

Hello, everyone! I hope you are having a great week so far and enjoying the good weather, which hasn’t been sufficient lately. Myself, I’ve been having a rather bizarre week. Last Tuesday, my husband and I decided we were in need of a new car. After researching for hours, we came across two very interesting pieces of advertisement, so I thought: why not share it with you, my fellow readers? I have decided to take these two ads and compare them:





The first advert comes from the TIME magazine and it is an advert for the new family car Note from Nissan.  The second advert also comes from the TIME magazine and it is for the new Mazda Child in the Front/Child in the Back series. 

To start with, what are the target audiences for these ads? I suppose it is the same target for both adverts, but with advertisement no one ever knows! The ads aim at families wanting to buy a car, of course.  Basically, their message is to say that both cars were designed to be normal cars and not fast, dangerous cars where a big family wouldn’t feel safe or comfortable.  I mean, I wouldn’t buy a car where I can’t fit my whole family but I also would like to have a stylish car, everyone likes to have nice things, right? 

One interesting thing my husband pointed out is that there is no real reference to the performance of the car, so how will the buyer know whether this “family car” thing will actually work or not? Seriously, they should at least point out the fuel use or something to incite the buyer and the family. As of right now, none of the cars caught our attention.

Anyways, now lets look at the main point of focus in each advert. Obviously they both want you to look at them in order to be attracted and actually buy the car, but for that, they need some tactics. First of all, the Nissan Note shows two kids complaining about mixing their school bags and others. That is something that happens in every single household with the two sexes; at home it never stops! Going back to the point, the company wants to emphasize the fact that their car has a divider in the car trunk in order for your kids to stop fighting and be a happy family. In other words, the new Nissan Note will bring happiness to the family and will prevent the children from fighting.

For the new Mazda series, the ad shows a kid and presumably his father hugging each other and smiling with a t-shirt with the design of the car. The slogan for the car is “Child in the Front/Child in the Back” and that could be interpreted as if the father was a child, which gives humor to this advert. The image on their t-shirts show the front and back of the car and the back is placed on the kids t-shirt and the front on the dads t-shirt. They are both smiling and once again, it suggests that having this car will give the family happiness and pleasure. It also shows a sense of unity since they are hugging and the father is holding his kids hand, as well as a sense of security since the kid is going to be seated at the back, rather than at the front where they are not supposed to be sitting.

Another thing to point out is that both adverts have their company’s logo for logo recognition. The logo for Nissan is situated at the bottom right of the advert and the one for Mazda is situated at the top left of the advert. I think the logo being present reinforces the company and also the car, which is important that people recognize the brand so they can associate the car with the logo of the company when they see it somewhere else.  Although it is an important aspect of advertisement, the logo is not being reinforced as much as the car is because the company has to get the reader to like the product first.

To what extent were these ads successful? Well, to start with, I believe both of them are strong in conveying the message of making the reader believe that if they buy the car they are going to be secure, protected, pleased, and comfortable and the car will bring peace of mind, happiness and delight to all members of the family. After all, isn’t that what we all want? Keep everyone happy?

To finish with, I noticed that neither of the adverts use big fonts or accentuate wording too much, and that’s a fair reflection of our society nowadays. We’ve all became lazy readers and barely anyone ever reads, so to catch the attention of the reader companies focus on images and pretty colors rather than having a lot of words which will make their audience easily bored making them throw away the ad and look at something else.

That’s all, folks! I will be updating my blog next Monday; I have a quite complicated schedule this week, the kids are having a party and I have got to organize the whole thing. Wish me luck!  Missing you already!


P.S.: Please, comment below on which advert do you think is the most effective and what car would you buy!

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

To Kill a Mockingbird Cover



I chose to do my cover like this because I wanted to show that we are free. As it is illustrated in the picture, the mockingbird has his wings open, he is flying to the horizon and he wants to fly away and be free. The mockingbirds, which shows a heart of the story, which is that it's a sin to kill a Mockingbird, also in the story a mockingbird represents innocence and when the birds fly away it’s because they want to go to other places, which is related to innocence, because when you lose it, you want to go to other places and try new things. The circle represents the shape of the sun, and I put it on the cover because once Jem said that in the morning everything it going to be better and the sun represents the morning. 

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Journal Entry

Dear journal,
         Scout and I went to see Tom Robinsons trial today. We sat on the colored seats, were Negroes sit. Mayella Ewell told the judges everything she knew, and what Tom Robinson did to her. I felt like she wasn’t telling the truth, and so did the other ones and that is why Atticus was asking so many questons. Tom Robinsons side of the story was more convincing. I didn’t like the part in which Mayella started crying, she is acting like a baby. When we went home for supper I didn’t get why Calpurnia was blue in the face at me for taking Scout to the jury. Scout should go to the trials to learn about whats going on and to do what the others young ladied in Maycomb do, now I get Aunt Alexandras point.
         Bob Ewell should be skin…alive for spitting Atticus in his face. I don’t have any quarrels with the Ewells, but I consider that sin. When I heard of that, Scout said that Atticus could perfectly shot Bob Ewell with a gun, he was a master in old times.. but I didn’t think it that way. Atticus is totally educated and he is a gentelmen, he wont do that. I remember when he didn’t want to shot the dog, if he didn’t want to kill an animal,he would not want to shot a human being.
         I knew that the jury had convicted Tom even before the veredict was read, because Atticus told me once that when a suspect is found guilty, the jury does not look at the convict. I think the jury needs more evidence to say that Tom is guilty. I beileve that he is not, because I think that Mayella is making this up to ask for attention. When atticus tasked her about her friends she said that Atticus was making fun of her and that was clear evidence that Mayella does not have any friends.
                                               Sincerely yours,
                                                                           Jem Finch